There’s been a relatively minor amount of word mincing during the municipal unions v. mayor showdown of the past few weeks. Still it’s fair to say that those words imply a little more than is printed. In that vein, we’ll take their sound bites and add some decoding. Try it out loud next time you read the paper.
Act I: City faces a budget shortfall of $131 million. Mayor Menino asks for the municipal unions to take a one-year wage freeze.
Menino on March 6, speaking at the annual meeting of the Boston Municipal Research Bureau: “Listen to your [union] membership. You may think you have the luxury of waiting. But you don’t. You may think I will bow to political pressure. I won’t.”
You better take those wage freezes. I’m not kidding. I’ll cut 700 jobs. Seriously. Beware the Ides of March. (Then makes spooky fingers and ooooh noise.)
Richard Stutman, President of the Boston Teachers Union: “This is the first time we’ve gotten any hard numbers from the city, and we’re glad that we finally got some details… We want to do our part like anyone else, but we need a little more information to go on.”
Ha. He’s bluffing. I don’t buy the 700 figure. No way are we going to take those wage cuts without a fight. I only get three months off out of the year as it is.
Thomas Nee, president of the Boston Police Patrolmen’s Association, stalls and blames the media: “There’s no blanket no, but there’s no guarantee, ‘Yes, I’m going to take a wage freeze,’… We’re still in the process of dealing with this, and I don’t want to do it in the paper… The ultimatums [March 15 or else] aren’t serving anybody’s interests.”
Yeah, the media. They are the ones behind all of this. Does it make sense that I’m telling this to the media? (more…)